NetHack - Vanilla NetHack
 
User: [Log In] [Create A New Profile]
Actions: [New Topic] [Print View] [RSS]
Search
Path: [NAO] [Forums] [NetHack]
Topic:
So just how low can Maud go? (5 Posts)
Started By:
Date:
December 22, 2009 10:10PM

So just how low can Maud go?
codehappy - December 22, 2009 10:10PM
 
I see Maud has a 2508-turn ascension now.

http://alt.org/nethack/userdata/Maud/dumplog/1261121547.nh343.txt

Given that you aren't even allowed to start the quest before turn 2000 (due to alignment caps), this has to be pretty close to the fastest possible ascension in number of turns. That is just really impressive.

Incidentally, is there a ttyrec viewer that handles the wide terminal size Maud and some other players use? I've been using TermPlay and it doesn't seem to handle those well. If worst comes to worst, I can just write one (it's a simple enough format) but if there's one ready made I'd appreciate a pointer. Thanks!
 

Re: So just how low can Maud go?
paxed - December 23, 2009 03:42PM
 
codehappy Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
>
> Incidentally, is there a ttyrec viewer that
> handles the wide terminal size Maud and some other
> players use? I've been using TermPlay and it
> doesn't seem to handle those well. If worst comes
> to worst, I can just write one (it's a simple
> enough format) but if there's one ready made I'd
> appreciate a pointer. Thanks!

IPBT should be able to do it, assuming you make the terminal large enough.

-- 
You( "are momentarily disoriented." );
 

Re: So just how low can Maud go?
casmith789 - February 26, 2010 02:24PM
 
oh, nht just did a 2185, hitting pudding farm bones :D

wasn't the fastest though :) I say you could (with max luck) hit ascension around 2100 theoretically.
 

Re: So just how low can Maud go?
valkyre - March 15, 2010 04:16AM
 
That is absolutly impossible without some sort of hacking
 

Re: So just how low can Maud go?
Chronomaster - May 07, 2010 03:15PM
 
valkyre Wrote:
-------------------------------------------------------
> That is absolutly impossible without some sort of
> hacking


Yeah. Some NetHacking. :V
 

Go to Topic: [Previous] [Next]